-teesa-:

9.17.14

18 Sep 14 @ 1:50 am  —  via + org  —  reblog

-teesa-:

9.17.14

18 Sep 14 @ 1:49 am  —  via + org  —  reblog
#ugh  
kennyvee:

kennyvee:

liberalsarecool:

ppaction:

NOPE. 

Republicans talking shit AGAIN. This @GOP tweet is the literal opposite of what they believe, campaign, and how they vote.

They know that no matter how outrageously they lie, their base will still believe them.

I reblogged this a couple weeks ago, but I’m reblogging it again because after sending that tweet out on September 1st, Republicans blocked equal pay (yet again) just two weeks later.

kennyvee:

kennyvee:

liberalsarecool:

ppaction:

NOPE. 

Republicans talking shit AGAIN. This @GOP tweet is the literal opposite of what they believe, campaign, and how they vote.

They know that no matter how outrageously they lie, their base will still believe them.

I reblogged this a couple weeks ago, but I’m reblogging it again because after sending that tweet out on September 1st, Republicans blocked equal pay (yet again) just two weeks later.

17 Sep 14 @ 11:10 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog

russalex:

Amid uproar over the N.F.L.’s handling of domestic abuse casesinvolving some of its players, Senator Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey, has introduced a bill that would disallow major professional sports leagues, most notably the N.F.L., from claiming status as tax-exempt nonprofits.

The bill is aimed at raising $100 million over 10 years, according to Booker’s office, which would be used to pay for state domestic abuse programs across the country. It is unlikely to gain widespread support.

Under the tax code, N.F.L. teams pay taxes, but the league office, which is funded by dues from its franchises, does not. The league has enjoyed this status, which is similar to those granted to industry associations, since the 1960s.


can we go after churches now?

17 Sep 14 @ 11:08 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog

missfords:

we can all enjoy whatever we want right? without thinking what people will think right? good

It’s not even about what people will think. They may think whatever they damn want, what you enjoy is not up to them! It’s not up to them to tell you what to enjoy, to try and make you feel bad about enjoying it, or guilt you into stopping!

Provided that what you enjoy is not harming anyone — and liking a show someone else doesn’t is not considered harming them! — it is absolutely none of their business. 

17 Sep 14 @ 11:04 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog

thiswandcouldbealittlemoresonic:

Rose Tyler + Her You-Know-I’ve-Already-Won Face

inspired by perfectlyrose's request

17 Sep 14 @ 10:49 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog
17 Sep 14 @ 10:16 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog
#lulz  
17 Sep 14 @ 10:07 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog

Repeat after me, folks: romantic plotlines don’t ruin female characters.

A female character isn’t weak because she has normal human emotions. She isn’t anti-feminist because she has vulnerabilities. There’s a difference between a female character existing entirely to be in love with the male character and a female character who happens to have a romantic subplot as part of her story.

It isn’t feminist to insist that female characters have to be “badass” unfeeling robots, detached from absolutely anything considered “feminine,” including, apparently, emotions. Sure, we don’t want female characters to be damsels in distress, but swinging in the other direction, to cardboard-cutout-badass-making-quips, isn’t much better. Good female characters appear human. And sorry, romance-haters, but love is a part of that.

— Rhiannon, FeministFiction, “Down With Love” (via tiorickyaoi)
17 Sep 14 @ 10:05 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog
Anonymous inquired:

I can't understand how someone so obsessed with true blood, can enjoy Once upon a time. bye!

missfords:

stillhidden:

Here, I am putting a reaction imgage for you, since you can’t access yours at the moment. :)

image

Seriously, what the …? 

Why do these anons insist on policing other people’s likes and dislikes?

Leaving aside the complete logical fallacy of this question — why would being obsessed with True Blood automatically preclude someone from enjoying Once Upon a Time? They are not mutually exclusive! — and moving right to the anon not understanding your enjoyment: So what?!

Half of the world doesn’t understand the other half’s pleasures and tastes. That’s kind of a given, because people enjoy different things. Why does this merit a hissy fit from some anon? :)

oh Alla you are awesome

here a reaction gif just for you

image

Awwww! Thank you, dearest! You are so sweet! :)

missfords:

Wow! You sound offensive bb! I dont think you can judge me bb since you dont have any idea who I am so you cannot say that sweetie! Besides I am the only one who will ever decide what is good/right/fine/wrong/strange for me to watch!
If this bye means you are leaving have a nice life

(Oh I wish the mobile app had a way to put reaction gif! Arghh)

i dont really understand why people waste their time sending msg like that… I leave my anon on because I feel some people really like to talk but they are sometimes shy and that makes easier to talk …but I have to endure this…bahh anyways! love u bb, thank u :) 

Right back at you! :) 

17 Sep 14 @ 10:02 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog
taardisblu:

And another Rose Tyler for Ash because I wasn’t happy with the first one but din’t know how to improve it. Hope you like it!
Want a painting?

taardisblu:

And another Rose Tyler for Ash because I wasn’t happy with the first one but din’t know how to improve it. Hope you like it!

Want a painting?

17 Sep 14 @ 9:43 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog
17 Sep 14 @ 7:55 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog
#hahaha  
Anonymous inquired:

I can't understand how someone so obsessed with true blood, can enjoy Once upon a time. bye!

missfords:

Wow! You sound offensive bb! I dont think you can judge me bb since you dont have any idea who I am so you cannot say that sweetie! Besides I am the only one who will ever decide what is good/right/fine/wrong/strange for me to watch!
If this bye means you are leaving have a nice life

(Oh I wish the mobile app had a way to put reaction gif! Arghh)

Here, I am putting a reaction imgage for you, since you can’t access yours at the moment. :)

Seriously, what the …? 

Why do these anons insist on policing other people’s likes and dislikes?

Leaving aside the complete logical fallacy of this question — why would being obsessed with True Blood automatically preclude someone from enjoying Once Upon a Time? They are not mutually exclusive! — and moving right to the anon not understanding your enjoyment: So what?!

Half of the world doesn’t understand the other half’s pleasures and tastes. That’s kind of a given, because people enjoy different things. Why does this merit a hissy fit from some anon? :)

17 Sep 14 @ 7:51 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog
17 Sep 14 @ 7:45 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog
17 Sep 14 @ 7:26 pm  —  via + org  —  reblog
OS